Decadal
Study-Request for Information (RFI) from Community
To: Members of the Earth and Environmental Science
Community
From: Rick
Anthes and Berrien Moore
Date: 25
January 2005
As you may
know, the Space Studies Board, in consultation with other units of the National
Research Council (NRC), has begun a study to generate prioritized
recommendations from the Earth and environmental science and applications
community regarding a systems approach to the space-based and ancillary
observations that encompasses the research programs of NASA and the related
operational programs of NOAA. The study will also consider such
cross-agency issues such as the development of an operational capability for
land remote sensing.
The study,
which will be carried out over a two-year period and organized in a manner
similar to other NRC Òdecadal surveys,Ó seeks to establish plans and priorities
within the sub-disciplines of the Earth sciences as well as an integrated
vision and plan for the Earth sciences as a whole. It will also consider
Earth observations requirements for research and for a range of applications
with direct links to societal objectives. We have been appointed by the
NRC as study co-chairs.
An open web
site (http://qp.nas.edu/decadalsurvey)
has been created to describe the study and to provide an opportunity for
community input throughout the study process. In addition, a number of
outreach activities are planned, including community forums in conjunction with
the fall 2004 and 2005 AGU meetings and the January 2005 and 2006 meetings of
the American Meteorological Society.
In order to
obtain the greatest possible input of ideas from the community about potential
mission concepts addressing Earth Science research and applications, we are
soliciting input from the broad community. We are especially seeking
ideas for missions or programs that are directly linked to societal needs and
benefits.
The ideas
and concepts received will be reviewed by one or more of the SurveyÕs seven
study panels, which are addressing the following themes:
1. Earth Science
Applications and Societal Needs
2. Land-use Change,
Ecosystem Dynamics, and Biodiversity
3. Weather (including
chemical weather and space weather)
4. Climate Variability
and Change
5. Water Resources and
the Global Hydrologic Cycle
6. Human Health and
Security
7. Solid-Earth Hazards,
Resources, and Dynamics
Based on
their potential to contribute to research and/or applications and societal needs,
each panel may select one or more of the concepts for further technical and
cost assessments. The Panels will recommend, in priority order, a number
of proposed missions for carrying out over the period 2005-2015, taking into
account a set of established criteria as described below. The Executive
Committee of the Decadal Study will interleave the Panel Recommendations, to
produce a final set of recommended missions, in priority order.
Three
categories of missions are solicited, following the approximate total (over
lifetime of mission) cost guidelines:
1. Small missions that
cost less than $200 M.
2. Medium size missions
that cost between $200 M and $500 M.
3. Large missions that
cost more than $500 M.
Each of the
proposed missions may contribute to research or operations, or both.
Note: Mission costs refer to costs that would be incurred by NASA in current
(FY05) dollars.
We invite
you to write a concept paper for a new space-based mission or measurement, from
existing or new vantage points, that promises to advance an existing or new
scientific objective, contribute to fundamental understanding of the Earth
system, and/or facilitate the connection between Earth observations and
societal needs. We anticipate concepts that will range from free-flying
spacecraft to instruments that might be included in follow-ons or as additions
to the NPOESS and GOES series of spacecraft. Constellations of spacecraft
or spacecraft that fly in formation with existing, planned, or future satellites
may also be considered.
All
responses will be considered non-proprietary public information for
distribution with attribution. The concept papers should be no longer
than ten pages in length and provide the following information, if possible:
1. A summary of the
mission concept, including the observational variable(s) to be measured, the
characteristics of the measurement if known (accuracy, horizontal, vertical and
temporal resolution), and domain of the Earth system (e.g. troposphere,
upper-ocean, land surface).
2. A description of how
the proposed mission will help advance Earth science and/or applications, or
provide a needed operational capability, for the next decade and beyond.
3. A rough estimate of
the total cost (large, medium, or small as defined above) of the proposed
mission over ten years. For operational missions the costs should include
one-time costs associated with building the instrument and launch and ongoing
operational costs.
4. A description of how
the proposed mission meets one or more of the following criteria, which will be
used to evaluate and prioritize the candidate proposals:
a. Identified as a high
priority or requirement in previous studies, for example NRC and WMO reports and
existing planning efforts such as the International Working Group on Earth
Observations (IWGEO: http://iwgeo.ssc.nasa.gov
);
b. Makes a significant
contribution to more than one of the seven Panel themes;
c. Contributes to important
scientific questions facing Earth sciences today (scientific merit, discovery,
exploration);
d. Contributes to applications
and/or policy making (operations, applications, societal benefits);
e. Contributes to long-term
monitoring of the Earth;
f. Complements other
observational systems;
g. Affordable (cost-benefit);
h. Degree of readiness
(technical, resources, people);
i. Risk mitigation
and strategic redundancy (backup of other critical systems);
j. Fits with other
national and international plans and activities.
Describe
each proposed mission in terms of its contributions to science and
applications, how the mission meets the above prioritization criteria, its
benefits to society, technical aspects, schedule and rough estimate of
costs. The description should provide enough detail that the potential
value and feasibility of the mission can be evaluated by an independent group
of experts.
For full
consideration, please submit the concept paper by April 15, 2005 via e-mail to:
rfi@nas.edu . Questions about the RFI may be directed to the study
director, Art Charo (acharo@nas.edu), or to us:
(anthes@ucar.edu); (b.moore@unh.edu). You can also contact
Dr. Charo by telephone at 202 334-3477, or by fax at 202 334-3701.