Attached are my interseismic strain-rate results for two NeoKinema
models of the southern California comparison test exercise:

NeoKinema_composite_interseismic_strain_rate.zip
is my best/preferred composite model, using both the GPS rates
provided and "my own" [Bird, 2007, 2009] geologic offset rates.

However, since other authors may not be using these geologic rates,
I am also sending a second model for comparison purposes:

NeoKinema_geodetic_interseismic_strain_rate.zip
does not use any geologic offset rates, but only GPS
(and, as usual, principal stress directions and velocity BCs).

The format is the same as in the files I sent you (David) last year
(except that these are now interseismic strain rates, and the
geographic domain is smaller).  That is:
-one file each for 3 components exx, exy, eyy = e_EW, e_NE, e_NS.
-units are /s, and extension is positive.
-values are stated at the center of each F-E, and also (the same value)
 near each corner of the triangular element.
The ideal way to interpolate these numbers would be with linear
interpolation in Delaunay triangles, but other methods should be OK.

Let me know if you need a different format or content.

Best wishes,
Peter Bird